The Higher Common Sense ([info]chronographia) wrote,
@ 2007-07-07 01:15:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:eating it up with a spoon
Entry tags:squee, the printed word, typegeek

I Am, Needless To Say, Smitten With This Book

A modern princess—of England, say, or Monaco— serves the purpose of being an adornment in the fantasy life of the public. Consequently, she receives the kind of education that one might think of giving to a particularly splendid papier-mâché angel before putting it at the top of the Christmas tree: an education whose main goal is proficiency in the arts of looking pretty and standing straight. Our century, whatever virtues it may have, is not an optimal time for princesses.

Things were different in the Renaissance. Intelligence had a primary value then. At almost every level of the social order, education was meant to create true amateurs—people who were in love with quality. A gentleman or lady needed to be at least minimally skilled in many arts, because that was considered the fittest way of appreciating the good things in life and honoring the goodness itself. Nor did being well-rounded mean smoothing over your finest points and becoming like the reflection of a smile in a polished teaspoon. Intelligence walked hand in hand with individuality, although having finely sharpened points of view did not, it was felt, require you to poke other people with them. If wit was a rapier, courtesy was the button at the end of the blade.

- Stephen Mitchell, The Frog Prince: A Fairy Tale for Consenting Adults


The entire book, slender volume that it is, reads like this. I could go on all day quoting it until I've read you the whole thing. But I won't. You wouldn't be able to see how delightfully typeset it is in Mrs. Eaves and that would be a damned shame.



(Post a new comment)


[info]lpetrazickis
2007-07-07 03:04 pm UTC (link)
That's a bit revisionist, or is that the point?

An ample supply of Renaissance nobles were semi- and illiterate soldiers. Their brides needed to be gracious hostesses, and that does not require a great deal of literacy.

The purpose of princesses in the Renaissance was to forge strategic alliances with powerful families at the expense of dowry and marriage. In much of Europe, salic laws prohibited female inheritance, so influential women were exceptions rather than the rule.

Finally, hand-copied books were expensive. The primary purpose of literacy was correspondence, not book-reading.

Am I misconflating education with literacy? As much as I disapprove of the contemporary pre-eminence of vocational education over academic education, I would not choose the Renaissance as my Golden Age of learning.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]chronographia
2007-07-07 04:26 pm UTC (link)
It is, I feel I should point out, a work of fiction (if the blatant use of 'Fairy Tale' in the title did not give this away already). So the tone is more to amuse and ruminate than to be strictly factual. And being a fairy tale, it takes liberties with many things.

The period of Renaissance to which the book does refer is the late Renaissance, early 1600s. Elizabeth of England had set the precedent for education so the truth isn't stretched as far as one might think.

When I post quotes I don't always remember to add in my disclaimer like I did with Neal Stephenson's The Diamond Age, because stating that I find the sentiment admirable and well worded but not entirely applicable outside of the constraint of the book's world-view . . . gets repetetive after a while, you know?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]spiralsheep
2007-07-07 09:56 pm UTC (link)
There's something very attractive about beautifully written bullshit. Our literary canon of the renaissance period, it seems to me, largely consists of men who practised that combination of skills.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]chronographia
2007-07-07 11:12 pm UTC (link)
The majority of my knowledge of the Renaissance is within the scope of the fine arts, but I'd have to agree with you about the literary canon. ::pokes at Marlowe gently with the mocking stick::

This book is gloriously written fibbing. I LOVE IT.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]spiralsheep
2007-07-07 11:57 pm UTC (link)
I've put it on my amazon wish list to remind me to look for it when it's published in paperback and also because my wish list is called "aimless consumerism" so when I add items I get a message saying "added to aimless consumerism", heh.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]chronographia
2007-07-08 05:00 pm UTC (link)
Could be worse. Could be 'aimless consumption.' At least all those Romantic poets were being consumptive to enhance their reputation.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]chronographia
2007-07-07 11:13 pm UTC (link)
Another excerpt of this gloriously written fib.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]nonsequitania
2007-07-08 04:36 am UTC (link)
(What has already been said about historical accuracy, and a vague idea about nostalgia for certain things regardless of accuracy. We *know* the Renaissance wasn't all purple and gold, as Johan Huizinga or somebody said, but courteous and wide-ranging intelligence's still a fine thing to pine for/aspire to. Good point, the buttoned rapier.)
Having muttered about beautified history, I love the prose. Just scholarly enough to temper the potential hyperbole.. or something. Speaking as a fan of Baskerville and fifteenth-century Aldine fonts (proto-Garamond and Bembo), Mrs Eaves looks perfect for it too. What a lovely piece of writing- thank you for that! Will read this book many times.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]chronographia
2007-07-08 05:43 am UTC (link)
I was quite fond of 'having finely sharpened points of view did not, it was felt, require you to poke other people with them,' which I feel certain parts of livejournal could do with understanding.

The prose style is very much a conceit, but one that winks at you knowingly in the midst of pontification. And the bit where the French royalty quote the Tao Te Ching to eachother requires the suspention of disbelief every bit as much as the erruption of Once Upon A Time across Europe. Now then . . . just four more impossible things to believe in, and then I can have breakfast.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…